I compared sample scores (Table step 1) and you will impulse moments (Desk dos) men and women having fun with t tests

I compared sample scores (Table step 1) and you will impulse moments (Desk dos) men and women having fun with t tests

We discovered that female ( ± 0.58) scored significantly higher than people (8.13 ± 0.68) towards key search activity. Significantly, that it finding dont simply be told me just like the a choice distinction to have the speed with which the task is actually carried out, as no reaction day variations was indeed found (Desk dos).

No differences came up regarding quantities of folk who replied the phone (79% of males and 81% of women, ? 2 (1) = 0.06,p = .80). Individuals who replied the phone read 8 easy standard degree inquiries therefore the best responses didn’t differ anywhere between guys (3.35 ± 0.35) and you will girls (3.84 ± 0.34),t(73) = 1.0,p = .32; nor did date spent on the telephone differ ranging from men ( ± step 3.thirteen moments) and you may female ( ± 3.65 seconds), t(73) = step 1.91,p = .06. Of those one did address the phone, we in addition to measured whether or not they earnestly multi-assigned while on the telephone or centered strictly on this cell phone – there is no factor 73% of men and you may 84% of females multiple-tasked, ? 2 (step one) = step 1.41,p = .24.

Discussion

Using one or two very different experimental paradigms, we discovered that ladies has actually an advantage more boys when you look at the specific aspects of multi-tasking points. Within the Test 1, i measured impulse rates of men and women creating two various other tasks. Continue reading “I compared sample scores (Table step 1) and you will impulse moments (Desk dos) men and women having fun with t tests”